Letting go of all stories. Even the one of the person or a human. Just being with experience. As I am just with the experience, there is not really anything human present. Seems the human side/experience is a story embedded in thoughts and perhaps more layers. Its so difficult to just experience without adding thoughts to the process. Without referencing, valuing and conceptualizing. Awareness and mind are so entangled its amazing. Mind as the conceptualizing, thinking, referencing, valuing, separating, storytelling etc. part. If I just observe, just that. Only experience. Just awareness being aware, then it is a very different experience altogether. So very different from the personal, human experience.
All in experience is in awareness, so its all in what I am. Nothing outside of I. Thinking I am the person/body in that experience is a drastic limitation I believe. An enormous shrinking of I. And a setting up of a separate reference point from where the material experience is perceived to happen.
As I disentangle from that limitation I should be able to see beyond the body, beyond localization. In extension, or rather, in freedom from limiting myself, all existence should be available to perceive.
I as the awareness in which it all is. Sharing the consciousness that is inherent in all things. Or actually that all things exists in. I unlimited. So the person is a limitation and can never go there, but I can as I disentangle from the person’s mechanics.
Its so drastical and extreme. I am not the person, human or even local. All those things are just a perspective I take on. In, or perhaps, as the experience.
Relaxing those activities to see my essence. To see all in me. To be all in me. To be the seeing itself.
Is there really any scene or ether it all happens in? There is seeing and that which is seen. Is there need for a third “thing”? The objects appearing in the seeing, existing in the seeing, same thing as they are seen.
Perhaps its just a non dual perspective that wants to add a 3rd field in which they “exist”. Seems to me, in my experience that, the field/screen may just be a non dual construct, a concession, to try to explain a phenomena outside of minds possible understanding.